Lets users select one or two documents, then ask grounded questions, generate summaries, extract key notes and compare content.
The examples below show where this project can be used, what decision it supports, and how a user can test the scenario in the sandbox.
Where it fits: Summarise obligations, reporting timelines, budget clauses and compliance risks from donor documents.
Decision supported: Help programme teams understand commitments before implementation.
How to test it: Select the sample grant agreement and ask for obligations, risks or summary.
Where it fits: Extract key findings, risks, action points and recommendations from monitoring reports.
Decision supported: Reduce time spent reading long field reports and improve follow-up.
How to test it: Select the monitoring report and request key notes or recommendations.
Where it fits: Ask targeted questions about payment terms, responsibilities, renewal clauses or risk language.
Decision supported: Support faster pre-review before escalation to legal or procurement experts.
How to test it: Upload a contract-style TXT/DOCX/PDF and ask specific questions.
Where it fits: Summarise methodology, findings, limitations and lessons learned from evaluation documents.
Decision supported: Improve evidence uptake by management and donors.
How to test it: Compare two selected documents and ask for shared themes.
Where it fits: Identify missing clauses, compliance gaps or evidence needed for audit files.
Decision supported: Improve readiness and reduce manual review pressure.
How to test it: Use the risks and gaps action on selected documents.
Where it fits: Convert lengthy documents into concise executive briefs with key decisions and follow-up actions.
Decision supported: Save leadership time while keeping the answer tied to source material.
How to test it: Ask for a board-ready summary from selected documents.
The examples above were revised against current industry and research references on how this class of analytics solution is used in practice.